The primary objective of this feasibility study is to provide an initial assessment of OA/US imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant thyroid nodules using HbO2 and HbR as the primary biomarkers.The secondary objectives are:- To…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Miscellaneous and site unspecified neoplasms malignant and unspecified
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
This is an early feasibility study exploring the use of OA for thyroid nodule
evaluation using HbR and HbO2 signal. Much is still unknown about the
interpretation of the images in thyroid nodules,therefore, both qualitative and
quantitative analysis will be performed as primary analysis:
1. Images and data will be reviewed first by Investigator Independent Reviewers
(experienced radiologists) to provide a basis for determining feature score
signals that indicate benign or malignant thyroid nodules as well as aggressive
and non-aggressive cancers.
2. A comparison of the in vivo opto-acoustic features on imaging with those
obtained from standard diagnostic imaging will also be done by the Investigator
Independent Reviewers (experienced radiologists).
3. Once thyroid feature scores are developed, Physician Independent Readers
(experienced radiologists) will read the images collected and score the nodules
using the new thyroid feature scoring system to determine whether a nodule is
considered benign or malignant. Descriptive statistics on the feature scores
will be performed as part of the primary analysis.
4. Lymph Nodes will be assessed for pathology correlation with thyroid cancer
histopathology and cytology The thyroid nodule will be marked with a region of
interest (ROI) in the obtained OA images. The signal (HbR vs HbO2) will be
qualitatively interpreted by three independent readers not involved in standard
clinical practice (experienced radiologists), blinded for
cytology/histopathology results. The index nodule will be classified as *not
suspicious* or *suspicious* for malignancy. In addition, quantitative
descriptive statistics will be performed.
5. The diagnostic accuracy of OA will be determined using cytology and
histopathology as golden standard. As such, sensitivity (Se), Sp, positive
predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy are
calculated.
6. AEs will be summarized for the Safety population. The number and percentage
of subjects with at least one event will be presented overall and by MedDRA
system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT). Subjects with more than one
occurrence of an AE within a given SOC and PT will be counted only once toward
that SOC and PT. AE will be summarized in a similar manner under the maximum
severity experienced. Subjects with more than one occurrence of an AE within a
given SOC and PT will be counted only once toward that SOC and PT under the
maximum severity experienced. These analyses will be repeated for SAE, ADE,
SADE, and unanticipated SADE.
For quantitative analysis, descriptive statistics will be used for the ITD
population and for the Safety population in order to assess subject
characteristics, cytopathological/histopathological thyroid nodule and lymph
node characteristics. Other quantitative study parameters collected include:
- Baseline characteristics (sex, age, race, etc.);
- Thyroid nodule size and location;
- OA/US vs US TI-RADS scores;
- Indication for US and FNA;
- Results of clinical US and FNA cytology;
- Preoperative laboratory results (e.g. TSH, T4, T3) (standard of care);
- Histopathological cancer type (papillary, follicular, medullary carcinoma,
etc.).
Primary analyses of study data includes descriptive statistics of the
aforementioned study parameters. Confidence intervals will be calculated as a
two-sided 95% confidence interval where appropriate, unless otherwise
specified.
Secondary outcome
Secondary analyses includes TI-RADs scores and OA/US thyroid nodule feature
scores stratified by cytology and histopathology type.
In addition to overall (i.e. pooled site data) analyses, summaries of each
study endpoint and other clinical/demographic/safety data will be provided by
study site in order to evaluate the consistency of the results across study
sites as a secondary analysis.
Additional analyses by clinical and/or demographic subgroups may be performed
on the following characteristics:
- Nodule Size
- Nodule Depth
- Age of Patient
- Type of cancer
Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated where appropriate.
Background summary
The prevalence of thyroid nodules is increasing, primarily due to incidental
detection during high-resolution imaging, with estimates ranging from 19-68% in
randomly selected individuals undergoing ultrasound (US). Despite the majority
being asymptomatic, further evaluation is necessary to assess malignancy risk.
This surge in thyroid nodules has led to subject anxiety, healthcare system
strain, and increased diagnostic costs. Ultrasound imaging is the primary
method for risk assessment, but its specificity is limited, leading to
unnecessary procedures. The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System helps
stratify risk, but up to 30% of fine-needle aspirations yield indeterminate
results, resulting in hemithyroidectomy for diagnosis. However, most surgeries
reveal benign nodules, indicating significant overtreatment. A pressing need
exists for a non-invasive tool to accurately rule out thyroid cancer early in
the diagnostic process.
Optoacoustic imaging (OA) is a promising non-invasive imaging technique that
uses pulsed light to visualize molecular contrast in tissue. OA's ability to
quantify blood oxygen saturation is crucial for assessing tumor hypoxia.
Combining optical contrast with ultrasonic resolution, OA offers deep tissue
imaging capabilities, making it an attractive modality for various
applications, including tumor characterization and assessment of physiological
biomarkers like sO2. The study focuses on optimizing the Imagio® OA-US
technology for imaging thyroid cancer. While promising, improvements in imaging
depth, quality, and tissue characterization are needed before clinical use.
Using accurate digital and physical thyroid phantoms, the study investigates
instrumental optimizations for artifact reduction and enhanced imaging of the
entire thyroid. Additionally, improved image processing and analysis methods
are explored to refine imaging performance and quantify data. The goal is to
extract qualitative and quantitative features to distinguish between benign and
malignant nodules. Overall, the study aims to show the feasibility of the
Imagio® OA-US technology for precise thyroid nodule assessment.
Study objective
The primary objective of this feasibility study is to provide an initial
assessment of OA/US imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant thyroid
nodules using HbO2 and HbR as the primary biomarkers.
The secondary objectives are:
- To investigate Imagio® US and OA features that may distinguish between
aggressive (i.e. anaplastic and medullary) and non-aggressive (i.e. papillary
and follicular) thyroid cancer.
-To investigate the feasibility of the Imagio® OA/US Imaging System to detect
feature scores that correlate with detecting lymph node pathology correlation
with thyroid nodule histology and cytology.
Study design
The current study is a non-randomized, non-blinded, prospective, multi-center
feasibility study conducted at University Medical Center Groningen and
Ziekenhuisgroep Twente hospital.
Study burden and risks
Burden:
Subjects will be imaged before their FNA appointment at the nuclear department.
The subjects will undergo one imaging moment of up to 30 minutes. Healthy
volunteers will undergo one imaging moment of up to 30 minutes. No other study
related procedures will be performed.
Risks
The Imagio® will not be used to diagnose subjects.
Risk management for the Imagio® imaging system to reduce clinical risks has
been completed in accordance with ISO 14971. This process identified hazards,
potential effects, potential causes, and mitigation activities for the
procedure and device. After all risk mitigations were implemented, all residual
risks for the Imagio® imaging system were within the acceptable range.
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713GZ
NL
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713GZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Age >= 18 years
- Written informed consent
- Having a TI-RADAS 3-5 thyroid nodule identified via standard of care US for
which US-guided FNA is indicated
- Willing and able to complete all procedures and assessments in accordance
with the clinical protocol
Exclusion criteria
- Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the subject*s ability to
give Informed Consent
- A condition or impediment (i.e., insect bites, poison ivy, open sores,
chafing of the skin, scar, tattoos, moles, etc.) that could interfere with the
intended Field of view (within one probe length or 4 cm of the nodule)
- Thyroid nodule greater than 3.0 cm in maximum diameter
- Previous or on-going radioactive iodine treatment
- Have an acute or a chronic hematoma and/or acute ecchymosis of the thyroid
- Is experiencing photo-toxicity associated with currently taking, or having
taken, photosensitizing agents within the previous 72 hours such as sulfa,
ampicillin, tetracycline
- Are currently undergoing phototherapy
- Have a history of any photosensitive disease (e.g., porphyria, lupus
erythematosus)
- Are undergoing treatment for a photosensitive disease and is experiencing
photosensitivity
- Subject has received chemotherapy for any type of cancer within 90 days from
date of screening or standard of care Ultrasound
- Previous surgery in head and neck area on the ipsilateral side of the index
nodule
- Previous radiotherapy in head and neck area
- Subject is pregnant (asked during IC procedure)
- Have had previous FNA of the target nodule of interest within the 45 days of
baseline OA
- Subject has participated in a clinical study of an investigational drug or
device within 3 months prior to screening ultrasound imaging that may have an
impact on clinical outcomes of this study
- Subject has previously participated in this study
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL86859.042.24 |