The primary scientific objective of this multicenter study is to examine if adding a behavioral weight reduction program to pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted exercise therapy, compared to pain neuroscience education and cognition-…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Tendon, ligament and cartilage disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcome measure: pain intensity.
The BPI (brief pain inventory) is one of the most widely used tools for
assessing clinical pain. Among other things, this brief questionnaire contains
4 questions investigating PAIN INTENSITY (the worst pain in the last 24 hours,
the least pain in the last 24 hours, the average pain and pain now). Since CLBP
is a rather fluctuating condition, the question *please rate your pain by
circling the one number that best describes your pain on the AVERAGE* is used
as primary outcome measure to evaluate pain intensity. The answer to this
question is formulated on an 11-point (i.e., 0-10, a decrease of 30% is
considered as clinically significant) numeric rating scale (NRS), which is
recommended as a core outcome measure in clinical trials of chronic pain
treatments. Reliability and validity of the scores obtained with the BPI are
established.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcome measure: other pain related outcomes
Pain related outcomes will be evaluated by several questionnaires (online). (1)
Besides pain intensity, the BPI (brief pain inventory) also evaluates the
impact of pain on functioning. The BPI measures how much pain interferes with
seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood,
enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep on an 11-point NRS (ranging
from 0-10). Using the same inventory for different outcome measures limits the
total burden for all included CLBP patients. (2) Furthermore, the Central
sensitization inventory (CSI), is used to assess self-reported signs of central
sensitization and its overlapping symptoms. It contains *part A* of 25
statements related to current health symptoms (scored on a 5-point Likert scale
ranging from 0-4). The CSI has proven psychometric strength.
Secondary outcome measure: body composition
Body weight (TANITA Bio-electrical Impedance Analyzer) and height (SECA
wall-fixed stadiometer) will be measured objectively and used to calculate BMI
(= weight[kg] / height[m]²). Body composition (incl. body fat and fat free
mass) will be assessed using TANITA MC-780SMA Bio-electrical Impedance
Analyzer. Because research findings informed us that body fat distribution, in
addition to total fat, should be considered when analyzing the obesity-CLBP
relationship61, waist and hip circumference will be measured using Cescorf
measuring tape.
Secondary outcome measure: physical activity, sedentary behaviour, dietary
intake, fear avoidance in relation to back pain, pain catastrophizing, and
function.
Valid self-report questionnaires will be used to assess energy balance related
behavior, incl. dietary intake (Food Frequency Questionnaire - software
developed and automated by the co-researchers), physical activity
(International Physical Activity Questionnaire - IPAQ - Dutch
version),sedentary behavior (Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire of Busschaert et
al.) fear avoidance in relation to back pain (Fear avoidance Questionnaire) and
pain catastrophizing (Pain catastrophizing scale). The Short Form Health
Survey-36 items (SF-36) will evaluate functional status and well-being or
quality of life. The SF-36 contains 8 subscales (ranging from 0-100): physical,
emotional, social and role functioning, body pain, mental health, vitality and
general health. The psychometric properties of the SF-36 are well characterized
in a wide variety of patient populations.
Background summary
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most common and important clinical, social,
economic, and public health problem of all chronic pain disorders across the
world. In addition to its high prevalence, CLBP is a severely disabling
disorder characterized by tremendous personal and socioeconomic impact, with
long-term sick-leave, low quality of life and very high socio-economical costs.
CLBP is the most expensive cause of work-related disability - it causes the
highest number of years lived with disability.
The most severe and debilitated CLBP patients often have comorbidities such as
overweight and obesity: pain intensity and disability in people with CLBP show
dose-responses to body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, percent fat and
fat mass. Meta-analyses confirm that overweight and obesity are associated with
LBP, with overweight and obesity identified as risk factors for LBP. Regarding
socio-economic impact, overweight or obesity is not only related to LBP
persistence, but also to higher rates of health care seeking for LBP.
Obviously, people with CLBP who are overweight or obese, are likely to have
more complex health needs requiring focus on lifestyle behavioral factors such
as physical activity/exercise and diet.
CLBP is a complex disorder which is difficult to treat. Exercise therapy is an
evidence based treatment for CLBP: both general exercises and
cognition-targeted exercise therapy have shown beneficial effects on pain in
patients with CLBP. Unfortunately, current treatments for CLBP apply a *one-
size-fits-all* approach and do not address comorbidities like obesity. This
knowledge gap is now acknowledged internationally. Overweight and obesity are
increasingly recognized as a plausible therapeutic target for people with CLBP.
Despite the growing body of scientific literature pointing towards the close
interaction between overweight/obesity and CLBP, few treatment programs for
people with CLBP nowadays take overweight into account.
A few studies explored the added value of weight reduction to the management of
people with CLBP. Yet, proof of concept for combining dietary changes with
exercise therapy for patients with CLBP and comorbid overweight/obesity can be
found in two main lines of research:
1) A small-scale proof of concept study showed that obese people with CLBP
(n=46) not only lost body weight but also experienced reduced disability and
48% less pain following a nonsurgical weight loss program, comprising of
changes in dietary behavior and exercise therapy. Although compelling, the
proof-of-concept study was uncontrolled (pre-experimental design), precluding
causal interpretation of the study findings. One Australian trial explored
effects of a telephone-based lifestyle behavioral intervention in reducing pain
in overweight or obese patients with LBP.
The trial is well designed, but the treatment mode was only telephone based,
possibly explaining why the intervention was unable to alter the patients*
diet, reduce body weight or increase physical activity, and no positive changes
in pain severity were observed. Poor engagement (29% compliance rate) in the
program may also explain the negative findings.
2) Extensive evidence in overweight/obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: Six
high-quality randomized controlled trials showed that dietary changes combined
with exercise therapy result in better outcomes (i.e., weight loss associated
with improvements in pain and function) compared to dietary changes or exercise
therapy alone in overweight/obese adults with knee osteoarthritis.
Additionally, one study examined the effects of a treatment that combined pain
coping skills training with behavioral weight reduction. This combined approach
was more
effective to reduce pain, disability, and pain catastrophizing, compared to
either intervention alone or a control intervention. These authors concluded
that a behavioral intervention that simultaneously addresses pain and weight
(i.e., a similar intervention as proposed in this application) can enhance the
ability to comply with the needed lifestyle changes to lose weight, which leads
to an improvement in pain and disability. A recent systematic review identified
the need for well-designed, high-quality randomized controlled trials to
examine this combined treatment in a large population of adults with CLBP and
comorbid overweight/obesity.
For all these reasons, here we propose studying the added value of a behavioral
weight reduction program (changes in diet, behavior and physical exercise) to
blended rehabilitation (pain neuroscience education plus cognition-targeted
exercise therapy) for overweight or obese people with CLBP. Both treatments are
effective in their specific target population (i.e., behavioral weight
reduction for overweight/obese people and pain neuroscience education plus
cognition-targeted exercise therapy for people with CLBP and normal BMI), but
whether their combined approach is cumulative in overweight/obese people with
CLBP is currently unknown and represents an important research priority.
Study objective
The primary scientific objective of this multicenter study is to examine if
adding a behavioral weight reduction program to pain neuroscience education and
cognition-targeted exercise therapy, compared to pain neuroscience education
and cognition-targeted exercise therapy alone, results in less pain at 6 months
follow-up in overweight or obese people with CLBP? Secondary objectives of the
study are to examine if adding a behavioral weight reduction program to pain
neuroscience education and cognition-targeted exercise therapy, compared to
pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted exercise therapy alone,
results in improved function, body composition, physical activity, sedentary
behavior, fear avoidance, pain catastrophizing and dietary intake at 6 months
follow-up in overweight or obese people with CLBP? All interventions will be
delivered online or in
person within a blended approach, using 1-on-1 appointments with a therapist in
person, online instructive videos, challenges to complete online, online
quizzes, online booklets, and online diaries/workbooks.
Study design
The overall study design is a Double-blind (participants and statistician)
randomized controlled trial (phase III), including two comparative, balanced
treatment arms. The trial will compare a behavioral weight reduction program to
pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted exercise therapy
(experimental treatment), to pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted
exercise therapy alone (control treatment). All interventions will be delivered
online and in person in a blended approach. The total study-duration for the
participants (from inclusion to last follow-up assessments) is 9
months. Screening and baseline assessment of one participant will take one
week. The questionnaires will be filled out at home (duration to fill all
questionnaires out = max. 20 minutes). Both treatment arms include a treatment
that lasts 10 weeks. The study ends with the last follow-
up assessments, 6 months after therapy completion.
Intervention
All participants will receive a combination of an online therapy program and
three 1-on-1 sessions with a physical therapist in person, within a 10-week
period. The online therapy (using the platform www.teachable.com) is delivered
using a blended approach and consists of instructive videos, challenges to
complete, online quizzes, online booklets, and online diaries/workbooks. The
experimental group will receive a behavioral weight reduction program combined
with pain neuroscience education plus cognition-targeted exercise therapy. The
combined therapy will adhere to guidelines for patient-centered care, including
offering an individualized treatment, continuous communication, education
during all aspects of treatment, working with patient-defined goals in a
treatment in which the patient is supported and empowered with a therapist
having social skills, being confident and showing specific knowledge. Therapy
is provided online and in person, and will be provided in different *chapters*,
allowing the patient to go through the information step-by-step since
information will be released in small parts. This way, all participants will
need 10 weeks to go through the complete program and treatment duration will be
standardized.
Study burden and risks
Previous studies have investigated comparable interventions and there are no
adverse events known by any of these studies. Also all interventions
investigated in this study are already used during usual care by many
therapists across the world and are recommended interventions described in
different guidelines in the treatment of obesity and/chronic low back pain.
Rochussenstraat 198
Rotterdam 3015 EK
NL
Rochussenstraat 198
Rotterdam 3015 EK
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Overweight/obese women and men with CLBP (n=100), defined as non-specific low
back pain for at least 3 months* duration, currently seeking care for low back
pain, will be recruited. Non-specific low back pain implies that patients are
not allowed to report leg pain of 7 or higher (on a maximum of 10) on a numeric
rating scale, or to have any evidence of specific spinal pathology (e.g.,
hernia, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, spinal fracture or
malignancy). Other inclusion criteria are aged between 18 and 65 years, being a
native Dutch speaker, being overweight (BMI >= 25 kg/m2) or obese (BMI >= 30
kg/m2), and access to internet/computer/tablet/smartphone.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with BMI >= 40 kg/m2 will be excluded as people being morbid obese are
eligible to undergo abdominal surgery. Because BMI may not always correspond to
the same body fat percentage in different individuals (e.g., athletic types
with higher muscle mass may also have BMIs >= 25 km/kg2), each participant's
body fat percentage will be measured and compared to the body fat percentage
reference values35. Participants with exceeding BMI but falling into the
healthy fat percentage range (which is sex-, age- and ethnicity dependent35)
will be excluded.
Exclusion criteria are: having a severe underlying comorbidity (like diagnosed
diabetes, cardiovascular problems, metabolic diseases, etc.), being pregnant or
given birth in the preceding year, or currently receiving dietary or exercise
interventions.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL86509.100.24 |