Dexmedetomidine when used intranasally fopr procedural sedation does not significantly decrease the proportion of patients with intellectual disability and dentophobia needing general anesthesia for dental treatemnt
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
Dentophobia
Intelelctual disability
Ondersteuning
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
• Proportion of patients in whom dental treatment
under procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine
can be finished and is not terminated because of inadequate
sedation.
<br>
• Proportion of patients in whom dental treatment
under general anesthesia can be finished and is not
terminated because of inadequate sedation.<br>
• mRASS-score at specified dental treatment events
after dexmedetomidine treatment compared to agitation
score descriptor from the non-pharmacological Trial-of-
Treatment
<br>
• mRASS-score at specified events during induction for
general anesthesia compared to agitation score descriptor
from the non-pharmacological Trial-of- Treatment
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Rationale: Many patients with intellectual disability lack adequate cognitive strategies to cope with the stress and fear accompanying medical or dental treatment. This makes surgical or dental procedures for these patients stressful if not impossible to tolerate without general anesthesia. Although general anesthesia provides the certainty of good access to the patient, the workup, induction and emergence of general anesthesia is often even more stressful for this vulnerable group of patients. A safe and reliable sedative with a quick and easy route of administration can provide patient comfort and ensure good cooperation and access.
Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine has been proven to be quick, comfortable and reliable in providing dose dependent sedation levels ranging from premedicative anxiolysis to deep conscious sedation. The literature only bases these conclusions on studies in adults with full cognitive function or children. Theoretically dexmedetomidine may provide an excellent alternative to more commonly used sedatives like benzodiazepines. Dexmedetomidine’s sympathicolytic effect can alleviate fear not by suppressing the cerebral projection of fear but by reducing the intrinsic activity of the brainstem arousal system and of the autonomous nervous system. Especially for patients without the cognitive coping abilities this may provide good and safe sedation. The study will focus on the feasibility and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation after nasal administration in these patients.
Objective: To demonstrate non-inferiority of conscious
sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine for performing
dental care in patients with intellectual disability and
dentophobia.
Study design: A single centre therapeutic randomized
non-inferiority study.
Study population: 30 ASA 1-3 patients with intellectual disability (mild to profound) who require dental examination or treatment, but in whom dental examination or treatment was not possible without pharmacological support in the dental policlinic ‘Bijzondere Tandheelkunde’ because of severe dentophobia.
Intervention: Intranasal administration of 1,5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine (using a medical atomizer device).
Main study parameters/endpoints:
• Proportion of patients in whom dental treatment
under procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine
can be finished and is not terminated because of inadequate
sedation.
• Proportion of patients in whom dental treatment
under general anesthesia can be finished and is not
terminated because of inadequate sedation.
• mRASS-score at specified dental treatment events
after dexmedetomidine treatment compared to agitation
score descriptor from the non-pharmacological Trial-of-
Treatment
• mRASS-score at specified events during induction for
general anesthesia compared to agitation score descriptor
from the non-pharmacological Trial-of- Treatment
This is a therapeutic trial. Participation in the study can
provide several benefits to the patients.
Induction of general anesthesia is a frightening event for
PwID whose ability to deal with fear on a cognitive basis is
reduced. Being hooked up to the monitoring system, the
need to breath in a ventilator mask with the strange smell of
volatile anesthetics or the placing of an intravenous canula
are all fearfull moments. This often leads to necessary but
very unwanted cases of frightened, fighting patients. Not
seldom do these patients have to be restrained for their own
good.
It is the inability to cope with stress and fear on a cognitive
basis that forms the group relatedness for this specific trial.
Dealing with frightened PwIDs is completely different from
dealing with frightened patients with full cognitive
capabilities. There is no conceiveable substitute for the
unique clinical problem faced by the specialized dentist and
the anesthetist.
Patients will receive either the standard care (dental
treatment under general anesthesia) or they will reiceve
anxiolytic procedural sedation. In either case the planned,
necessary dental treatment will be completed. Patients who
can not be treated with dexmedetomidine procedural
sedation alone will receive a general anesthetic in the same
procedure to complete their dental treatment. Even if the full
dental treatment cannot be completed after
dexmedetomidine administration, the sedative effects of IN
dexmedetomidine will make tolerance of usually unpleasant
procedures easier and less frightening. Studies in children
and adults without intellectual disabilities have shown that
dexmedetomidine is well tolerated when administered
intranasally by either droplets or atomizer spray. In children
and adults without intellectual disabilities, the dose used has
been shown to be safe and effective.
The presence of a dedicated anaesthesiologist will be
constant during the study period in which dexmedetomidine
is used. The sedation with dexmedetomidine has no
implications for general anesthesia (should this be indicated)
that can not easily be accommodated for by the attending
anesthetic team.
Tolerance of the treatment is measured constantly by
sedation and agitation scores. When a patient has a
sedation/agitation score indicating less tolerance to
treatment under sedation compared to treatment in the OPD,
this signals that the treatment is no longer in the patients
best interest and they will receive standard institution
treatment (i.e. be converted to GA) and study procedures
will stop.
The dentist in attendance is a specialist in providing dental
care to specifically this vulnerable group of patients, and is
trained in using both non-pharmacolgical and
pharmacological strategies in the treatment of PwIDs and
dentophobia.
No follow up visits will be required.
After the dental procedure the subject will be in normal post-surgical care. The study medication is not expected to have implications for this period. As is normal after procedural sedation and daycare surgery under general anesthesia, subjects will be discharged with adult supervision and will be asked to spend the night following the procedure under the care of a responsible adult. Subjects not planned for daycare surgery will be admitted to the ward as is normal. No follow up visits will be required.
Doel van het onderzoek
Dexmedetomidine when used intranasally fopr procedural sedation does not significantly decrease the proportion of patients with intellectual disability and dentophobia needing general anesthesia for dental treatemnt
Onderzoeksopzet
Start of dental treatment until completion of dental treatment or until induction of general anesthesia
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Single dose intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine
Publiek
C.R.M. Barends
Postbus 30.001
Groningen 9700 RB
The Netherlands
050-3616161
c.r.m.barends@umcg.nl
Wetenschappelijk
C.R.M. Barends
Postbus 30.001
Groningen 9700 RB
The Netherlands
050-3616161
c.r.m.barends@umcg.nl
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
1. Intellectual Disability of DSM-V classes Mild to
Profound
2. Failure to tolerate the indicated dental treatment
with non-pharmacological support.
3. Indication for dental treatment under general
anesthesia because of 1 and 2.
4. Completed and cleared through the pre-anesthetic
screening as per the standard protocol of the UMCGs
department of anesthesiology
5. Adult, men and women, 18-65 years of age,
inclusive.
6. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 17.5 and ≤ 35 kg/m2,
inclusive, and a total body weight >50 kg, at screening and
check-in.
7. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical
Status 1-3
8. Able to understand the study procedures as
described in the patient information sheet, willing and able to
comply with the protocol, and to provide written informed
consent OR in the case of legal incapability: a guardian
understanding the study procedures as described in the
patient information sheet, provides written informed consent.
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
1. Contraindications for the use of dexmedetomidine
2. Known intolerance to dexmedetomidine
3. History or presence of significant cardiovascular
disease (ASA >3), or significant cardiovascular disease risk
factors, significant coronary artery disease, or any known
genetic pre disposition to cardiac arrhythmia (including long
QT syndrome.)
4. History or presence of significant (ASA >3)
pulmonary, hepatic, renal, hematological, gastrointestinal,
endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, neurological, disease.
5. History of any illness or medication use that, in the
opinion of the PI, might confound the results of the study or
pose an additional risk to the subject by their participation in
the study.
6. Difficulty in airway management anticipated by the
attending anesthesiologist .
7.
8. Surgery within the past 90 days prior to dosing
judged by the PI to be clinically relevant.
9. History of febrile illness within 5 days prior to
dosing.
10. History or presence of alcoholism or drug abuse
within the past 2 years.
11. Hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to
components of dexmedetomidine, , or to compounds related
to the study medications.
12. Patients refusal or, in case of legal incapability:
13. Guardians refusal
Opzet
Deelname
Voornemen beschikbaar stellen Individuele Patiënten Data (IPD)
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Geen registraties gevonden.
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL5663 |
NTR-old | NTR5798 |
Ander register | UMCG Research Register : 201600438 |