The present study aimed to improve the performance of the A-DIVA scale by identifying predictors other than those included in the original scale. A modified A-DIVA II scale will be created which is applicable in the total hospitalized population to…
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
Peripheral IV cannula (PIV) insertion
Ondersteuning
Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
Concord Hospital, Concord, United States of America
UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
The primary outcome variable was defined as failed peripheral intravenous cannulation on the first attempt. Peripheral intravenous cannulation was defined successful, if the practitioner was able to inject a saline flush without signs of infiltration. We determined an attempt as one percutaneous needle puncture, regardless the amount of subcutaneous exploration from the single puncture site. After a failed attempt, a new attempt was stated to be any change in localizing a vein, followed by a new percutaneous puncture.
Doel van het onderzoek
The present study aimed to improve the performance of the A-DIVA scale by identifying predictors other than those included in the original scale. A modified A-DIVA II scale will be created which is applicable in the total hospitalized population to predict a difficult intravenous access in adult patients prospectively based on clinical observations.
Onderzoeksopzet
Measurement of time needed for the procedure started with identifying the target vein visually and/or by palpation. End time of the procedure was registered after securing the IV cannula in a successful attempt.
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Practitioners, both nurses and physicians from any specialism or medical department, who were familiar with the study protocol, routinely obtained the peripheral intravenous access. A peripheral intravenous catheter was inserted in the upper extremity, and veins on the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the upper extremity were considered for peripheral cannulation, including the metacarpal, cephalic, basilic, and median veins. Intravenous cannulation was performed according to practice guidelines. Before cannulation, a tourniquet was secured around the chosen arm, at least ten centimeters proximal to the elbow crease, and palpated and visualized to identify and acceptable vein. The tourniquet was tightened while maintaining pulsations of the radial artery. The puncture side was prepped with Chlorhexidine 70%. After each puncture, the practitioner checked whether the attempt was successful or not. The size of the inserted intravenous catheters ranged between 14 to 22 gauge, whereas the size of the catheter depended on the clinical situation.
Publiek
Wetenschappelijk
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
All patients were adults, regardless their American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status, demographics, and medical history.
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
Patients were excluded if they did not understand or answer the questionnaire (due to physical or communicational disorders) or were unresponsive, when intravenous access had been gained already, and because of protocol violations.
Opzet
Deelname
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Geen registraties gevonden.
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL5694 |
NTR-old | NTR5846 |
Ander register | MEC-U (Catharina Hospital Eindhoven) : niet-WMO 2015-21 |