We hypothesize that a minimally invasive approach during the first relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula is associated less mortality. Due to the retrospective design results should be interpreted with caution. Possibly there still are specific…
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
Postoperative pancreatic fistula
Ondersteuning
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Mortality
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the most notorious complication after pancreatoduodenectomy for it is associated with a high mortality. In the management of severe pancreatic fistula, a minimally invasive approach appears to be superior to relaparotomy in terms of mortality. However, a minimally invasive management strategy is not successful in all patients. A small number of patients with fulminant pancreatic fistula might ultimately require surgical intervention. During relaparotomy, different strategies have been identified: surgical drainage, completion pancreatectomy, disconnection of pancreatic anastomosis with preservation of the remnant, salvage pancreaticogastrostomy, redo of the pancreatic anastomosis and repair of the pancreatic anastomosis. Completion pancreatectomy is the most aggressive treatment in which the focus of the inflammation is removed completely, a downside of this procedure is the subsequent brittle diabetes. On the other side, pancreas preserving procedures might not be sufficient and thereby lead to further deterioration and prolong hospital stay. In the current literature there is only little written on the clinical outcomes of different surgical treatment strategies, including timing of completion pancreatectomy, in patients with fulminant postoperative pancreatic fistula. The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical treatment strategies, including timing of completion pancreatectomy and the clinical outcome in patients with severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy requiring a relaparotomy.
Doel van het onderzoek
We hypothesize that a minimally invasive approach during the first relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula is associated less mortality. Due to the retrospective design results should be interpreted with caution. Possibly there still are specific patient who would benefit from a more invasive approach (i.e. complection pancreatectomy).
Onderzoeksopzet
Total duration: From December 2018 – December 2019.
Data collection and analysis: From December 2018 – July 2019.
Writing and publishing manuscript: From July 2019 – December 2019.
Publiek
Wetenschappelijk
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
Patients undergoing relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
-
Opzet
Deelname
Voornemen beschikbaar stellen Individuele Patiënten Data (IPD)
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Geen registraties gevonden.
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL7596 |
Ander register | METC LUMC : G17.059 |