The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of EBRT versus SEMS insertion for palliation of dysphagia symptoms in patients with esophageal cancer
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
Esophageal cancer
Dysphagia
Palliative treatment
External beam radiation therapy
Stent insertion
Ondersteuning
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Primary outcome of this study will be “dysphagia response”, regarded as ≥1 grade reduction of the dysphagia symptom scale. Assessment of primary outcome will be conducted at 4-weeks follow-up.
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Update 3 December 2019:
Study has been stopped prematurely for poor accrual
Rationale: Dysphagia is the most common symptom of incurable obstructive esophageal cancer. Palliative treatment aims to relieve dysphagia, maintain nutritional intake and improve quality of life. Current clinical guidelines advice to use brachytherapy over self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for dysphagia relief in patients with a life expectancy greater than 3 months. Nonetheless, the use of brachytherapy in current clinical practice is low. Alternative treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is given for palliation of dysphagia in esophageal cancer. Both EBRT and SEMS insertion have proved to be effective, however, no comparative data about these two different modalities are available.
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of EBRT versus SEMS insertion, for palliation of dysphagia symptoms in patients with esophageal. Secondary objectives of this study include to compare dysphagia response over time, NRS pain score, number of adverse events, quality of life, costs, dysphagia free survival and overall survival.
Study design: Multi-center randomized trial.
Study population: The research population of this study will consist of patients who will undergo palliative treatment for malignant dysphagia due to esophageal cancer.
Intervention: Patients will be randomized to either SEMS insertion (Niti-S S Esophageal Stent) or EBRT (5 fractions of 4 Gy each with opposing fields in anterior-posterior direction).
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome of this study will be “dysphagia response”, regarded as ≥1 grade reduction of the dysphagia symptom scale. Assessment of primary outcome will be conducted at 4-weeks follow-up.
Doel van het onderzoek
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of EBRT versus SEMS insertion for palliation of dysphagia symptoms in patients with esophageal cancer
Onderzoeksopzet
Follow-up will be conducted by telephone interviews at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and monthly herafter until a maximum of 6 months or death.
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Patients will be randomized to either SEMS insertion (Niti-S S Esophageal Stent) or EBRT (5 fractions of 4 Gy each with opposing fields in anterior-posterior direction).
Publiek
M.C.W. Spaander
‘s Gravendijkwal 230
Rotterdam 3015 GC
The Netherlands
+3117040704
v.spaander@erasmusmc.nl
Wetenschappelijk
M.C.W. Spaander
‘s Gravendijkwal 230
Rotterdam 3015 GC
The Netherlands
+3117040704
v.spaander@erasmusmc.nl
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
- Histologically proven esophageal cancer
- Patients with metastases or inoperable patients
- No curative treatment options available
- Dysphagia grade of ≥ 2
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Written informed consent
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
- Malignant extrinsic compression
- Previous stent placement
- Evidence of tumor within 2 cm of the upper esophageal
sphincter
- Presence of an esophagotracheal and/or -bronchial fistula
Opzet
Deelname
Voornemen beschikbaar stellen Individuele Patiënten Data (IPD)
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Geen registraties gevonden.
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL6920 |
NTR-old | NTR7116 |
Ander register | METC ERasmus MC : - |