The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of pneumodilatation with 'sham'-treatment (placebo intervention). It is hypothesized that pneumodilatation will resolve dysphagia faster than sham dilatation.
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Pneumodilatation (balloon dilatation), Fundoplication (anti-reflux operation), prolonged dysphagia.
Ondersteuning
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Dysphagia symptom severity (Eckardt score)
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Rationale: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is 10-20% in the western world. Typical symptoms are heartburn and regurgitation. The most effective treatment is laparoscopic fundoplication, in which the fundus of the stomach (partially) placed around the distal esophagus. Postoperative dysphagia is usually self-limiting within 2-6 weeks. In 5-10% of patients however, prolonged dysphagia is seen (> 3 months postoperatively). Treatment options are an expectative approach or dilation of the lower esophageal sphincter and surgically constructed wrap around it. Pneumodilation (PD) is generally believed to be the most effective dilatation technique, but it has never been shown that dilation of the LES and wrap is actually more effective than the expectative approach.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of pneumodilatation (PD) on prolonged dysphagia after Toupet or Nissen fundoplication compared to sham dilatation.
Study design: This is an interventional, multicentre trial. Either pneumodilatation or sham dilation is performed in a randomized, single-blinded manner.
Study population: 42 adult patients with prolonged dysphagia (> 3 months) after primary Nissen or Toupet fundoplication for GERD.
Intervention: In one group a pneumodilatation is performed and in the other group a sham dilatation (endoscopy without intervention) is performed .
Main study endpoints: Dysphagia symptom severity (Eckardt score).
Doel van het onderzoek
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of pneumodilatation with 'sham'-treatment (placebo intervention). It is hypothesized that pneumodilatation will resolve dysphagia faster than sham dilatation.
Onderzoeksopzet
Baseline: high-resolution manometry, barium esophagography, informed consent, questionnaires
Day 1 (visit 1): Endoscopy with pneumodilatation or sham dilatation
Day 7: Questionnaires by telephone or mail.
Day 30 (visit 2): high-resolution manometry, barium esophagography, questionnaires
Questionnaires are: Eckardt score, Short form-36 (health related quality of life), Reflux disease questionnare (RDQ), Impaction dysphagia questionnaire (IDQ)
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Patients with persistent dysphagia more than 3 months postoperatively will be randomized to either pneumatic dilatation or to sham dilatation.
Pneumatic dilatation: During endoscopy under sedation. The Rigiflex 35 mm balloon will be positioned in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) area (x-rays can be used or this can be done under direct endoscopic guidance) and inflated to 35mm at 8 psi and maintained until the “waist” of the balloon is obliterated, or for at least one minute.
Sham dilatation: This endoscopy will also be performed under sedation. However, no dilatation or other intervention will be performed.
The patient is blinded to the treatment.
Participating sites:
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
- Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort
- University Hospital Leuven, Leuven
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht
- St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein
Publiek
A.J. Bredenoord
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
The Netherlands
+31 (0)20 5661745
a.j.bredenoord@amc.nl
Wetenschappelijk
A.J. Bredenoord
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
The Netherlands
+31 (0)20 5661745
a.j.bredenoord@amc.nl
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
• Patients after primary Nissen or Toupet fundoplication for GERD
• Dysphagia that was not present before surgery and lasting for at least 3 months
• Eckardt symptom score ≥ 4
• Written informed consent
• Age above 18 years
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
• Significant dysphagia before surgery
• Previous dilatation for dysphagia
• History of (pseudo)achalasia
• Anatomical defects causing dysphagia (slipped, malpositioned or
herniated fundoplication)
• Allergy to barium sulfate
Opzet
Deelname
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL5115 |
NTR-old | NTR5247 |
CCMO | NL50376.018.14 |
OMON | NL-OMON47334 |