There is a possibility that the Philadelphia neck collar gives better results than the stifneck collar on the proposed outcomes.
ID
Bron
Aandoening
Related to the cervical collars:
- Indentation marks
- Skin temperature
- Comfort
In dutch: indentatieletsel, huidtemperatuur en comfort.
Ondersteuning
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Indentation marks divided in: none, mild and severe.
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Background
Trauma patients who are immobilized with a cervical collar for preventive reasons, are at risk for developing collar related pressure ulcers (CRPU). There is a possibility that the Philadelphia cervical collar (C- collar) is a more favourable alternative for preventive immobilization using the Stifneck C-collar in trauma patients. However, the influence of risk factors for CRPU in the latest versions of these C-collars remains unclear due to lack of recent studies. Besides the patients’ condition, produced pressure, fit of the medical device and increased skin temperature seem relevant risk factors. It is possible that comfort and indentation marks (IM) are a sign of the exerted pressure and fit of the C-collar.
Aims
Primary Objective is to evaluate the effect of the Stifneck and Philadelphia cervical collar on incidence and severity of IM in immobilized healthy volunteers. Secondary Objectives are to evaluate the effect of the Stifneck and Philadelphia cervical collar on skin temperature and experienced comfort in immobilized healthy volunteers.
Design
Single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Population
Healthy human volunteers from eighteen till 65 years old.
Intervention
One group receives the Stifneck C-collar and the other group receives the Philadelphia C- collar. Both groups are immobilized for 20 minutes in the C-collar.
Main study parameters
The main study parameter is the incidence of IM at the end of the immobilization time divided in no, mild or severe IM. In addition, skin temperature is measured by an infrared thermometer and experienced comfort is assessed by a five-point Likert scale.
Analysis
Difference between groups for the main parameter is tested by a Chi-square test. Secondary parameters are tested on differences by unpaired sample T-test and Chi-square test.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness
Participants have one site visit of about 30 minutes. There are no risks while participating in the study.
Doel van het onderzoek
There is a possibility that the Philadelphia neck collar gives better results than the stifneck collar on the proposed outcomes.
Onderzoeksopzet
T0: before immobilization in the cervical collar
T1: after 20 minutes of immobilization in the cervical collar
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
1. Laerdal Stifneck cervical collar
2. Philadelphia Tracheatomy cervical collar
Publiek
Wetenschappelijk
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
Healthy volunteers
18 till 65 years old
Speak and read the Dutch language
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
Wound on and around the neck area, dermatologic diseases, blood circulation or pulmonary disorders, Diabetes Mellitus type I or II, previous spinal injuries or surgery, osteoporosis or spondylosis, use of analgesics in the past 24 hours, current neck pain, current pregnancy and chiropractic or physical therapy in the past six weeks.
Opzet
Deelname
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Geen registraties gevonden.
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL6793 |
NTR-old | NTR6979 |
Ander register | METC-protocolnummer : 17-912/C |