19 results
1. To proof local delivery of intravenously administered liposomal glucocorticoids (Nanocort) in subjects with peripheral artery disease by demonstrating Nanocort in atherosclerotic tissue. 2. To determine the differences between cytokine production…
Primary objectives:(1) To determine the safety and tolerability of pembrolizumab. (2) To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) of pembrolizumab by independent central review according to the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria (…
The objective of this study is to test the safety, tolerability and anti-tumor activity of the combination of the investigational products epacadostat and pembrolizumab, compared to pembrolizumab as mono therapy, in patients with unresectable or…
Primary:1) To compare OS in subjects with squamous cell carcinoma of the Esophagus.2) To compare OS in subjects with PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS)*10%3) To compare OS in all subjectsSecondary:1) To evaluate the progression free survival (PFS)…
1. To evaluate the progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with ipilimumab refractory advanced MEL receiving either MK-3475 or chemotherapy.2. To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in patients with ipilimumab refractory advanced MEL receiving…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
Primary Objectives(1) To evaluate the overall survival (OS) of subjects with metastatic or locally advanced/unresectable urothelial cancer that has recurred or progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy (recurrent/progressive metastatic…
The objective of this study is to test the safety, tolerability and anti-tumor activity of the combination of the investigational products epacadostat and pembrolizumab, compared to pembrolizumab as mono therapy, in patients with cisplatin-…
Objectives: To compare PFS using RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR and OS in PD-L1 positive subjects and all subjects between the following treatment comparisons:(a) Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy(b) Pembrolizumab versus…
The objective of this study is to test the safety, tolerability and anti-tumor activity of the combination of the investigational products epacadostat and pembrolizumab, compared to pembrolizumab as mono therapy, in patients with advanced/…
Primary Objectives:(1) Objective: To compare the overall survival (OS) in subjects with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab compared to standard treatment.Secondary Objectives:PD-L1 Positive Population:(1) Objective: To compare Overall Survival (OS…
Primary:In 1L subjects with metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving investigator*s choice of standard of care chemotherapy (i.e. carboplatin and a taxane):1. Evaluate progression free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 as…
Primary Objectivea) Phase I (Safety Run-in) The primary objective of the Phase I Safety Run-in part is to investigate the safety of IO102 in combination with either pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (carboplatin and pemetrexed)…
To assess the safety and biodistribution of 89Zr-pembrolizumab and its uptake in tumor and target irAE tissues
To evaluate the efficacy of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab, as measured by the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review
Primary Objective:To evaluate the anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) (200 mg Q3W) as 1L therapy in subjects with advanced/unresectable (inoperable) or metastatic urothelial cancer who are ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy. Objective…
The purpose of this study is to test the safety, tolerability and anti-tumor activity of the research study drug, Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) compared to other chemotherapy drugs of physician*s choice (which includes Capecitabine, Eribulin, Gemcitabine…
Objective- To evaluate anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) by evaluating the absence of high risk NMIBC or progressive disease in subjects with CIS at baseline (cohort A) and subjects without CIS at baseline (cohort B).Hypotheses:-…
1) Objective: To compare the overall survival (OS) of previously-treated subjects with NSCLC in the strongly positive PD-L1 stratum treated with MK-3475 compared to docetaxel.2) Objective: To compare progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by…