Continuous Intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion is not cost-effective compared to Deep Brain Stimulation
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
- Bewegingsstoornissen (incl. parkinsonisme)
Aandoening
advanced Parkinson's disease, gevorderde ziekte van Parkinson
Betreft onderzoek met
Ondersteuning
MedTronic
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
The costs per unit on the PDQ-39 and the costs per QALY for the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses respectively. The EQ-5D will be applied as the utility measure.
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Rationale: Both Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are accepted therapies for the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Neurologists and patients tend to prefer the more expensive CLI although a scientific rationale is lacking. To determine the optimal treatment in advanced PD, a comparative study of CLI and DBS is warranted.
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CLI is a more expensive therapy in advanced PD than DBS and that the surplus in costs is not cost-effective with regard to benefits for the patient and caregivers in quality of life, PD symptoms and adverse events.
Objective: To realize a cost-effective treatment strategy in advanced PD.
Study design: Prospective, randomized, open label multicentre trial, with two additional patient preference treatment arms (“patient preference randomized trial”).
Study population: Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonia, or bradykinesia. A total of 66 patients will be randomized, at least 120 patients will be included in the patient preference arms.
Intervention: Patients will be randomized to DBS or CLI. For DBS treatment, 2 electrodes will be implanted in the brain. The electrodes are connected to an implanted pulse generator, which will be placed subcutaneously in the subclavian area. For CLI treatment, a tube will be placed in the jejunum via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). This tube is connected to an external pump that delivers the levodopa-gel.
Main study parameters: There are 6 specified assessment visits: at baseline, and 1 week, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after start of the study treatment. The primary health economic outcomes are the costs per unit on the PDQ-39 and the costs per QALY for the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, respectively. The EQ-5D will be applied as the utility measure. Among the secondary outcomes are neurological impairments, functional health, care use and perceptions of patients and neurologists regarding both treatments.
Doel van het onderzoek
Continuous Intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion is not cost-effective compared to Deep Brain Stimulation
Onderzoeksopzet
1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after treatment
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Continuous Intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS).
Publiek
Afdeling Neurologie <br>
Postbus 22660
J.M. Dijk
Amsterdam 1100DD
The Netherlands
020-5669111
j.m.dijk@amc.uva.nl
Wetenschappelijk
Afdeling Neurologie <br>
Postbus 22660
J.M. Dijk
Amsterdam 1100DD
The Netherlands
020-5669111
j.m.dijk@amc.uva.nl
Leeftijd
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
- Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease with bradykinesia and at least two of the following signs; resting tremor, rigidity, and asymmetry;
- Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, at least one of the following symptoms: severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonia or bradykinesia;
- A life expectancy of at least two years.
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
- Age below 18 years
- Previous PD-neurosurgery (e.g., DBS, pallidotomy, thalamotomy);
- Previous CLI (through a PEG-tube or Nasal Jejuna| tube);
- Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 at the best moment during the day;
- A Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 25 or less (MOCA; http://www.mocatest.org);
- Psychosis;
- Current depression;
- Contraindications for DBS surgery, such as a physical disorder making surgery hazardous;
- Contraindications for PEG surgery such as interposed organs, ascites and oesophagogastric varices, or for Duodopa;
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and women of child bearing age not using a reliable method of contraception;
- No informed consent;
- Legally incompetent adults.
Opzet
Deelname
Voornemen beschikbaar stellen Individuele Patiënten Data (IPD)
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL4753 |
NTR-old | NTR4881 |
CCMO | NL51240.018.14 |
EudraCT | 2014-004501-32 |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT02480803 |
OMON | NL-OMON50651 |